| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
1. Predictions for post-speed nerf - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Venkul Mul Defenders are already capable of intercepting missiles fired to a different target than you. wrong
- by Marcus Aurelius - at 2008.10.08 21:32:00
|
2. Falcons, jammers, ECCM and Eos - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
people are ****ing lazy, they dont want to adapt to ecm. It's been that way since launch. Whenever ecm turns good, the same people or type of them start whining about their gank/tank equasion being interfered with by a third factor. Damps and TD...
- by Marcus Aurelius - at 2008.10.06 16:11:00
|
3. Quiting EvE this month. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So like, what should they do about it ? supply&demand, they aren't really something they can change much about.
- by Marcus Aurelius - at 2008.10.06 16:05:00
|
4. Whats with the unreachable 0.0 regions? - in EVE New Citizens Q&A [original thread]
It¦s Jove and polaris space isn¦t you mean right ? That¦s been there from the start, hasn¦t been used yet because it hasn¦t been needed and was previously sometimes used by CCP event actors to practice or hold events and shit. And probably to run...
- by Marcus Aurelius - at 2008.10.01 14:20:00
|
5. Proposals involving doomsdays and cynojammers (Srs bzns thread) - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
There's more to warfare then bringing enough people to kill the target. There's also teh art of making sure your enemy doesn't bring enough to defend it. Somehow, some people forget this, at convenient times.
- by Marcus Aurelius - at 2008.03.28 19:30:00
|
6. BOB kill goon QY6 Jammer (not locked version) - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Marcus Aurelius on 28/03/2008 18:55:57 Originally by: Zagum Darkfin I don't understand what's the big deal. Goonies just set their stront timers for RA primetime and the towers will get saved. No worries. QY6-RK contai...
- by Marcus Aurelius - at 2008.03.28 18:55:00
|
7. Industrial Conglomerate a partial solution to high sec gankage. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Marcus Aurelius on 25/03/2008 16:14:34 Since actual protection of a spread-out group of people is very impractical, you are left with your "protection" functioning on the basis of dissuading attack by using war decs on agressor corp...
- by Marcus Aurelius - at 2008.03.25 16:13:00
|
8. edit - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
If titans+cynojammers+poswarfare are the problem. Because titans are the only answer for the less numerous to blobbage overkill by the numerous... How about making pos less important instead of more ?
- by Marcus Aurelius - at 2008.03.10 16:47:00
|
9. Shield or Armor tanking - in EVE New Citizens Q&A [original thread]
Either, depending on ship. Never, however, both. Some examples of ships: Rupture: armor Stabber: shield Vagabond: shield tempest: any/none typhoon: armor maelstrom: shield So, a minmatar character needs to determine which ships will suit his pl...
- by Marcus Aurelius - at 2008.03.04 18:26:00
|
10. Tips for using an Ishkur? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Fit rails, bring a set of small t2 combat and the rest in small ew drones. Kill stuff with combat drones, get out by switching to ew drones.
- by Marcus Aurelius - at 2008.02.26 19:05:00
|
11. Suggestion: remove requirement of sovereignty for station ownership. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I know, weird. But let's sum some stuff up: Succes in territorial warfare is largely measured by station ownership. Wether or not you can dock, refit, or whatever is the foremost practical concern in deeper 0.0 especially. Currently you can only...
- by Marcus Aurelius - at 2008.01.30 10:13:00
|
12. How many of you.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I've got two, (well, three, but one inactive), but rarely play them as multitasking operation. The main reason for me to have more then one is the ability to be in more then one place at the same time. It's nice to be able to log on second comba...
- by Marcus Aurelius - at 2008.01.25 09:22:00
|
13. What if each EVE faction had its own currency? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
A fixed or NPC controlled (automated) conversion rate wouldn't add that much to gameplay. However, a freefloating player-determined conversion rate would add a monetary market to gameplay, which would be quite interesting I'd say. However, indee...
- by Marcus Aurelius - at 2008.01.25 08:39:00
|
14. The Titan Thread to End All Titan Threads - A Report - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Jesus, talk about overanalysing something... The situation with titans is very very clear. There's three issues that may (imo do) need adressing: 1. it's ability to DD remotely and not be open to any form of attack while doing it. 2. it's abili...
- by Marcus Aurelius - at 2007.05.11 15:19:00
|
15. Clarification? Bumping ships out of POS - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Marcus Aurelius on 06/05/2007 16:43:11 Just ask Evil Thug, he got a carrier this way sometime last week I believe. Also, the exploit mentioned in that devblog refers to people boarding ships that are inside a bubble, or scooping st...
- by Marcus Aurelius - at 2007.05.06 16:46:00
|
16. Clarification? Bumping ships out of POS - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It's ok. This is not biggie tbh, there's not many people silly enough to park lots of expensive ships at a pos anyway. ... It'll be fixed too, I hope. Just gotta laugh at it while it's not.
- by Marcus Aurelius - at 2007.05.06 14:30:00
|
17. Clarification? Bumping ships out of POS - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Some background for the last couple of posters. 1. POS bowling has been ruled to NOT be an exploit. 2. AAA and D2 have had fun using exactly this in the past as well. 3. nothing is going to be reimbursed. 4. yes, anchoring a large bubble in th...
- by Marcus Aurelius - at 2007.05.06 14:14:00
|
18. problem with lev5-6 agents - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Motherships can't enter deadspace. ... You bet your ass these missions will all be in deadspace. ... ...
- by Marcus Aurelius - at 2007.05.03 19:58:00
|
19. Your ships hangar (Epeen Extender Thread) - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
1. sabre 2. vagabond 3. megathron 4. arazu 5. falcon 6. cheetah 7. raven 8. stiletto 9. dominix 10.crow
- by Marcus Aurelius - at 2007.05.03 19:34:00
|
20. Closed 10/10, when will they open? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tbh, I find the fixes that are needed so simple to think of that i'm amazed that it's taken like what ? two years ? before we finally see this comment from you Oveur ? It's been moneths since before rev one dev added a nice comment in a mission t...
- by Marcus Aurelius - at 2007.04.23 18:36:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |